Blog

Dec 06, 2023

A New Route for High

Scientific Reports volume 5, Article number: 18244 (2016) Cite this article 1381 Accesses 13 Citations Metrics details The synthesis of highly biocompatible polymers is important for modern

Scientific Reports volume 5, Article number: 18244 (2016) Cite this article

1381 Accesses

13 Citations

Metrics details

The synthesis of highly biocompatible polymers is important for modern biotechnologies and medicine. Here, we report a unique process based on a two-step high-pressure ramp (HPR) for the ultrafast and efficient bulk polymerization of 2-(hydroxyethyl)methacrylate (HEMA) at room temperature without photo- and thermal activation or addition of initiator. The HEMA monomers are first activated during the compression step but their reactivity is hindered by the dense glass-like environment. The rapid polymerization occurs in only the second step upon decompression to the liquid state. The conversion yield was found to exceed 90% in the recovered samples. The gel permeation chromatography evidences the overriding role of HEMA2•• biradicals in the polymerization mechanism. The HPR process extends the application field of HP-induced polymerization, beyond the family of crystallized monomers considered up today. It is also an appealing alternative to typical photo- or thermal activation, allowing the efficient synthesis of highly pure organic materials.

High-pressure (HP) technologies are a very important tool in materials science and are widely used to transform an initial material into a new material that exhibits properties of high technological interest. The synthesis of diamond from graphite under high pressure is one of the most striking examples in this field1. Recently, the increasing attention to environmental issues and the growing demand for the development of green chemistry processes2 has opened new fields of applications for HP technologies3. In this perspective one of the most important benefits of HP chemistry is the possibility of initiating chemical reactions without the use of potentially toxic solvents, catalysts or radical initiators4,5,6. High-pressure science is also important in fundamental condensed matter physics and chemistry. Essentially, HP-induced chemical reactions are governed by two factors that may compete under certain conditions. First, an increased density leads to large modifications in the intermolecular interactions and electronic structure, making the system thermodynamically unstable. Second, the stress induced by the HP results in significant potential energy barriers, which can lead to selectivity in the reaction pathways. For example, in molecular crystalline solids, the reactant orientations can promote or prevent a specific reaction channel according to the so-called topochemical principle. Therefore, although the energy added to the system by compression may be sufficient to initiate the reaction, the constraints induced by the dense environment can prevent molecular rearrangements along the reaction coordinate and even impede the reaction. Examples of irreversible or reversible HP-induced chemical reactions have been reported in several reviews7,8,9.

Among the HP-induced chemical reactions, polymerization attracts significant interest due to the possibility of obtaining pure polymers that are free of radical-generating additives. In the past decade, the HP polymerization of small, unsaturated hydrocarbon molecules in liquid and crystalline phases has been extensively studied both experimentally4,5,10,11,12 and theoretically13,14,15,16. According to these studies, high pressure favors breaking of double or triple π-bonds which produces radical species that trigger chain reactions. These HP reactions occur above a pressure threshold and proceed slowly on a timescale of several hours or days. Two approaches have been considered to accelerate these reactions. The first approach consists of increasing the pressure. However, due to the reduction of molecular mobility with increasing pressure, this approach is restricted to monomers in ordered phases in which the polymerization does not require large molecular rearrangements5,17. Therefore, photoactivation is commonly considered to be the unavoidable approach for accelerating the reaction kinetics and reducing the pressure threshold required to initiate polymerization18.

Here, we report that polymerization reactions can be efficiently induced by a new high-pressure-ramp (HPR) process without photochemical or thermal activation. The efficiency of this new approach is demonstrated on the bulk polymerization of the 2-(hydroxyethyl)methacrylate (HEMA) monomer. In addition to its high efficiency, the major advantage of HPR polymerization is the production of long polymer chains in a very short reaction time (few minutes), which is much shorter than that (several hours to days) required for polymerization at static high pressure4,5,6,10,11,12. Due to the large field of application of poly-HEMA (pHEMA) as a highly biocompatible material19,20, the HPR process leading to the most pure pHEMA without the use of potentially toxic catalysts, is extremely appealing for medical applications or elaboration of photosensitive organic-inorganic hybrid materials21,22,23.

The polymerization of HEMA is typically triggered by radicals produced by thermal or photoexcitation. It proceeds via a classical addition reaction in three steps: initiation, propagation and termination. The proposed HPR process enables to control the first two steps of the sequence. The first step is initiated at pressures greater than 6.5 GPa, at which radicals are formed from excited HEMA monomers. Their reactivity is however hindered by the dense glass-like environment. The second step is completed at pressures less than 2 GPa, at which the sample becomes again liquid and the radicals are released from their fixed positions at a higher pressure. The process is shown in Fig. 1, in which the diamond anvil cell (DAC) used to apply the pressure is illustrated, along with a photographic image of the recovered sample.

Scheme for HEMA polymerization using the HPR process.

The photographic image shows a typical recovered sample.

We have used Raman spectroscopy to monitor the evolution of HEMA under increasing pressure (Fig. 2). The energies and assignments of the observed Raman bands are reported in Supplementary Table 1. Because the C=O bond is not involved in the polymerization process, its stretching vibrational band at 1710 cm−1 can be used to normalize the intensities of the spectra. These spectra indicate that HEMA does not polymerize when subjected to increasing pressures between 2 and 15 GPa. Indeed, if polymerization occurred, the intensity of the characteristic C=C vibrational modes at 1404 and 1640 cm−1 would decrease and the intensity of the C–CH2 deformation mode at 1452 cm−1 would increase with the elongation of the polymer chains6,24. This hypothesis disagrees with our observations for HEMA on compression because the decrease in the C=C band intensity in these series was not correlated with an increase in the C–CH2 band intensity. No further modifications of the spectra were observed over a period of several days when HEMA was maintained at a fixed pressure.

Raman spectra of HEMA upon compression from ambient pressure to 12 GPa.

At ambient pressure, four main vibrational bands are observed: the C=C bond at 1407 and 1641 cm−1 associated respectively with the C=CH2 stretching and C=C aliphatic stretching vibrations, the C–CH bond at 1455 cm−1 associated with deformation of C–H group and C=O stretching at 1714 cm−1 (see supplementary table 1).

When the pressure increases relative intensities of bands related to C–CH2 deformation and C=O stretching remain roughly constant. On the other hand, compared to these bands, relative intensities of bands related to C=C (1404 and 1640 cm−1) strongly decrease (see supplementary figure 2). We think that this behavior does not only result from changes of Raman polarizabilities. A change in the Raman polarizability requires a significant change in the geometry of HEMA molecule. However, the strength of intramolecular bonds in HEMA, especially of the C=C double bonds, is high enough to resist the compression achieved in our experiments. Indeed, XRD investigation on high pressure behavior of crystalline polyethylene25 has shown that directional elastic modulus along the chains of ethylene molecules in the crystalline phases is at least 3500 GPa. The intramolecular incompressibility in the ethylene molecule (H2C=CH2) should be even higher because the latter contains also a much weaker resistance against deformation between the adjacent molecules in the chain. Accordingly, the maximal pressure of 12.3 GPa achieve in our work is certainly far too low in order to be able to influence significantly geometry and polarizability of the C=C double bond.

We assign the observed modifications of the Raman spectra in the energy range 1400-1800 cm−1 to the activation of HEMA monomers by the C=C double bond opening without the formation of polymer chains. The process is reversible and a rapid opening of the DAC results in the relaxation of excitation, as shown by the Raman spectra of the recovered liquid sample:

The decrease in the C=C band intensity was due to the thermal population of the T1(3ππ*) triplet state. Indeed, the electron in the π* orbital lengthens the C=C double bond, which acquires a single-bond character26,27.

The Raman bands of HEMA became stiffer and broader as the pressure increased. Their frequency shifts as a function of pressure are shown in Supplementary Figure 1 and the coefficients are listed in Supplementary Table 1. The absence of discontinuities in this behavior (i.e., progressive broadening, similar coefficients of linear shift and absence of new vibrational bands) at pressures less than 15 GPa indicates that there is no transition to a hypothetical crystalline phase. Structureless XRD patterns of the compressed samples also support this explanation. In addition, viscosity measurements exhibited an abrupt densification of HEMA at pressures of approximately 2 GPa6, which is assigned to the glass transition.

According to reaction (Eq. 1), the increase in pressure shifts the equilibrium between the singlet S0 and triplet T1 states of the HEMA molecule toward the T1 state. The reaction of the HEMA(T1) molecules was restricted by the steric environmental constraint. However, when the pressure was decreased to less than the critical pressure (pc = 2 GPa), were the monomers released from their fixed positions in the glass state? Figure 3 shows the Raman spectra of HEMA compressed at 8.3 GPa and then decompressed in a stepwise fashion to atmospheric pressure. As the pressure decreased from 8.3 to 2.5 GPa, the Raman bands exhibited characteristic softening. The relative intensity of the C=C bands increased slightly, indicating S0 ← T1 relaxation and the C–C band intensity remained unchanged. In contrast, when the pressure decreased to 0.5 GPa, the C–C band intensity increased substantially and the C=C intensity decreased, which is a characteristic feature of polymerization propagation due to the formation of covalent single bonds between monomers. Using this pressure ramp the transformation becomes irreversible

Raman spectra of HEMA at selected pressures during step-by-step decompression from 8.3 GPa to ambient pressure.

The sample was maintained at each transient pressure for a few minutes.

The recovered sample fills the entire volume of the DAC and its Raman spectrum (supplementary Figure.3) exhibits similar to that of pHEMA produced by conventional free-radical polymerization with initiators.

Few HP reactions induced by compression-decompression cycle have been already reported in the case of aromatic molecules like benzene and furan28,29,30. Both molecules start to react in the solid phase at relatively high pressures, respectively 23 and 1O GPa. Nevertheless, the reaction mainly proceeds when the pressure is released through the opening of the aromatic rings. This behavior was assigned to the large rearrangement the molecules must undergo to react. Such movements, prevented at high pressure by the high density of the crystal, become possible under decompression when the crystal structure relaxes to accommodate the bonds reorganization. Eventually, recovered samples based on amorphous hydrogenated carbon compounds (a:C-H) are obtained.

The apparent disagreement between the reversible (Eq. 1) and irreversible (Eq. 2) reactions mediated by high pressures indicates a kinetically limited polymerization process. The nature of the active species that survive the pressure ramp and trigger the reactions remains unclear. The recovered samples were analyzed by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) to gain insight into these species. For these and subsequent experiments, the standard experimental protocol was as follows: liquid HEMA was compressed to a pressure p1, then decompressed to p2 and maintained at this pressure for 5 min prior to opening the cell and analyzing the sample. The dissolution of the recovered sample in tetrahydrofuran (THF) for GPC analysis was not complete, indicating the formation of long polymer chains. The chromatograms of liquid HEMA and the sample recovered after the HPR process are shown in Fig. 4. The HEMA monomer (with molecular weight of 130 g/mol) was detected at 9.96 min. The peaks with molecular weights of 394, 545 and 676 g/mol were assigned to oligomers formed by 3, 4 and 5 monomers, respectively. Due to the incomplete solubility of the recovered sample, the relative intensities of the GPC peaks for long polymer chains underestimated their real populations. The shoulder at 7–8 min corresponds to chains with a molecular weight of 2000–4000 g/mol and the peak at 5 min was due to larger polymers with weights of approximately 45000 g/mol. Therefore, the GPC analysis indicated that the HPR process results in rapid polymerization of HEMA without sacrificing the polymer chain length.

Gel permeation chromatogram of pHEMA synthesized using the HPR process.

Molecular weights are reported in g/mol. The chromatogram of liquid HEMA prior to the HP treatment is represented by a dotted line. The *peak corresponds to THF impurities.

The GPC analysis indicated the remarkable absence of HEMA dimers in the recovered sample, which signifies their preferential consumption during the polymerization. However, this consumption is possible only if these dimers are radical species that trigger the reaction. The HEMA2•• biradicals can be spontaneously formed in the first step of compression at pressures greater than 2 GPa when HEMA is in glass-like state. These biradicals react later when they leave their fixed positions at pressures less than 2 GPa and a rapid polymerization process takes place promoted by a high concentration of the excited biradicals. Therefore, the final species in the polymerized samples are HEMA and (HEMA)n species with n > 2. The role of excited triplet state biradicals as polymerization initiators has been previously proposed by Lingnau et al.31,32,33,34 and recently confirmed by quantum chemical calculations35 to explain the spontaneous polymerization of methyl methacrylate at high temperatures and ambient pressure. The formation of excited biradical dimers in triplet state has also been suggested to explain the polymerization of small hydrocarbon monomers at high pressures16. Our results suggest that polymers could be initiated by biradicals.

The efficiency of the HPR process, which is defined by pressures of the first (p1) and second (p2) stages, was obtained from measurements of the conversion yield (CY) according to6:

where IC=C and IC=O are the integrated intensities of the ν(C=C) and ν (C=O) Raman bands, respectively. The CY as a function of p1 (with fixed p2 = 0.5 GPa) and p2 (with fixed p1 = 7 GPa) are shown in Fig. 5a,b. The CY exhibits a threshold at p1 = 2 GPa and reaches a plateau with a maximum of 90% for pressures higher than 6.5 GPa (Fig. 5a). In the second series (Fig. 5b), the CY strongly increased with the pressure (p2) and reached a maximum at 0.4 GPa. With a further increase in the pressure, the CY decreased to zero at p2 ≥ 2 GPa. In addition, the CY is also zero at atmospheric pressure (p2 = 0.1 MPa). The optimal domain of pressures in the HPR process can be defined as p1 ≥ 6.5 GPa and p2 = 0.5 GPa. The polymerization initiation (at p1) and propagation (at p2) kinetics are relatively rapid and complete on the timescale of approximately 1 min.

Conversion yield as a function of pressures p1 (a) and p2 (b) of the two-stage HPR process (decompression pressure p2 = 0.5 GPa (a) and compression pressure p1 = 7 GPa (b) were used).

Interestingly, when hydroquinone, used a holes inhibitor, is added to HEMA the recovered sample, obtained in the conditions p1 = 7 GPa and p2 = 0.5 GPa, exhibits a conversion yield of 15% significantly lower than the 90% measured in absence of hydroquinone. This result suggests that polymerization proceeds through radical way. Nevertheless, the modifications induced by HP on hydroquinone molecule are unknown. In particular, the reactivity of hydroquinone in dense media could be different to that at ambient pressure what would explain the observed residual polymerization (15%). The radical nature of the initiator species produced during the HP compression step was confirmed in additional experiments, where the sample, which was initially compressed at 9.5 GPa, was quenched to atmospheric pressure and opened for a period of time before a pressure of 0.5 GPa was applied. When the experiment was conducted in a glove box (Ar gas, residual O2 and H2O <0.5 ppm), a solid sample was recovered with a CY of ≈90%. In contrast, the sample remained liquid (non-polymerized) when the same procedure was performed in ambient air. These results indicated that the polymerization initiators disappear in contact with ambient humidity, which is a strong indication of their radical nature.

Because HEMA polymerizes without cross-linking, polymerization requires significant mobility of the monomers to accommodate the growing chain. Therefore, the reaction is sensitive to the constraints induced by the environment. The experimental results presented above can be rationalized in the framework of the model described below. Figure 6 shows the evolution of the energetic structure of HEMA along with the constraints induced by the environment for the relevant pressures of the first (p1 ≥ 6.5 GPa) and second (p2 < 2 GPa) stages. The proposed reaction pathway, which is represented by an arrow, is based on the formation of an excited biradical at pressure p1 and the subsequent propagation of the polymer chain at pressure p2. The main features of this mechanism are as follows:

The increase in pressure reduces the energy gap between the occupied π(HOMO) and unoccupied π*(LUMO) orbitals, enabling population of excited states13,18,36. Therefore, some HEMA molecules are excited in the T1(3ππ*) triplet state, which is characterized by double-bond opening (Eq. 1). The reversible decrease in the C=C bond intensity in the Raman spectra confirmed this conclusion (Fig. 2).

At pressures of p1 ≥ 6.5 GPa, a favorably oriented excited monomer HEMA(T1) reacts with other monomers to form a metastable activated biradical HEMA2••, which is stable at any pressure but disappears in contact with atmospheric humidity. Dimerization occurs when the intermolecular distance becomes sufficiently short to make the system unstable13,14,15,16 . This result was validated experimentally. The reaction of the biradical is prohibited (i) at pressures above 2 GPa due to its steric confinement in the amorphous phase of HEMA and (ii) at low pressures of less than 0.1 GPa due to its limited reactivity.

HEMA returns in the liquid state on decompression to pressures p2 less than 2 GPa. The accompanying decrease in the energy barriers (Fig. 6) releases the biradicals from their fixed positions. Therefore, the reactions of HEMA2•• with monomers are no longer sterically hindered:

Energy level diagram of HEMA at pressures p1 (—) and p2 (---) relevant for the HPR process.

The energy barrier represents the constraints induced by the environment at a given pressure. The arrow represents the system evolution during polymerization in the HPR process (see the text for more details).

As a result, the formation of all of the oligomeric species except HEMA2 is allowed and proceeds rapidly.

Recently, the HP-induced self-polymerization of HEMA at room temperature was observed in a very limited range of pressures from 0.1 to 1.6 GPa6. In comparison to this static HP approach, the HPR process increases the CY from 30% to 90% and reduces the reaction time from few weeks to couple of minutes. The higher rate and efficiency of the HPR process can be related to the high concentration of HEMA2•• biradicals that are formed in the first stage of the process. In contrast, the high energy of the HEMA(T1) triplets reduces the probability of their direct thermal excitation at pressures less than 1.6 GPa (see Fig. 6). Although the UV photoexcitation of the HEMA(T1) triplet increases the reaction rate6, it remains much slower than that of the presently proposed HPR process, that also offers higher efficiency when compared with both the static HP and photoassisted static HP processes.

The described HPR induced polymerization is a powerful method for controlling polymerization reactions and an appealing alternative to the photochemical activation of chemical reactions at high pressures. In addition, this approach extends the application field of HP-induced polymerization beyond the family of ordered (crystallized) monomers considered up today. The possibility of the rapid and efficient polymerization of HEMA using the HPR process without a catalyst, significantly reinforces the potential for synthesis of highly biocompatible materials. In comparison to the typical radical polymerization methods with thermal or photon activations, the HPR process will reduce the environmental impact of large-scale fabrication. The possibility to separate activation and propagation stages of the polymerization process, will also enable the fabrication of high-purity thin films, organic or hybrid composites and other biocompatible materials.

Liquid HEMA (purity >99%, Aldrich) without further purification was loaded into a 150 μm diameter hole drilled in a preindented metal gasket and was compressed in a symmetric diamond anvil cell (DAC). The anvils, which were made of IA type diamonds, were selected due to their low fluorescence in the frequency range of the Raman measurements. Pressure of samples in the DAC was monitored with a precision of ±0.05 GPa using the ruby fluorescence scale. The Raman spectra of the samples compressed at room temperature were measured in the backscattering configuration using a HR800 spectrometer equipped with a Peltier-cooled CCD detector (Horiba Jobin Yvon) with spectral and spatial resolutions of 0.25 cm−1 and 5 μm, respectively.

The samples (0.1 mg) for chromatographic analyses were prepared in a Bridgman anvil system37. Liquid HEMA was loaded into a 1-mm diameter hole drilled in a stainless steel gasket (thickness 250 μm) and compressed in a symmetrically opposed anvil system. The anvils were made of tungsten carbide sintered with 12% of cobalt (WC + 12% Co) and had the working surface diameter of 3 mm. The pressure on the opposed anvil system was applied by a commercial tensile and compression press (Instron 1195). The samples were compressed up to 7.5 GPa and immediately decompressed down to 0.5 GPa, which was maintained for 10 minutes. As a result, solid polymerized samples (diameter 800 μm, thickness 120 μm) were obtained.

The molecular weight and polydispersity of the polymeric chains were measured using gel permeation chromatography (GPC). The Dionex Ultimate 3000 GPC apparatus was equipped with a Polymer Laboratories MesoPore 3-μm column (300*7.5 mm) in an isothermal oven (35 °C) in series with a UV-visible detector (detection wavelength λ = 210 nm). The eluent flow rate (HPLC grade tetrahydrofuran, THF) was set to 1.0 mL/min. Particular attention was paid to the calibration of the column for low molecular weights (100–1000 g/mol). The calibration was performed using a set of polystyrene standards (EasiCal PS-2 Polymer Laboratories, Mp = 580–20650 g/mol range) with a very narrow polydispersity, including ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (CAS: 97-90-5, molecular weight 198.22 g/mol) and lauryl methacrylate (CAS: 142-90-5, molecular weight 254.41 g/mol). The polymerized samples were dissolved in THF in an ultrasonic bath for two hours. Each analysis solution (1 mg polymer dissolved in 2 mL THF) was introduced via a manual injector loop (volume injected 20 μL). Data acquisition and analysis were performed with Chromeleon V 6.80 software supplied by Dionex.

The X-ray diffraction measurements were obtained on the XRD1 beamline38 of the ELETTRA synchrotron with monochromatized radiation of λ = 0.6889(1) Å collimated with a 30-μm pinhole. The XRD patterns were collected with a 2D detector Dectris Pilatus 2M (1475 × 1679 pixels, pixel size 172 × 172 μm2) located 170 mm from a sample compressed in a Boehler-Almax plate DAC39. The latter was mounted on a Huber Kappa Goniometer and oscillated during the data collection by ±2°.

How to cite this article: Evlyukhin, E. et al. A New Route for High-Purity Organic Materials: High-Pressure-Ramp-Induced Ultrafast Polymerization of 2-(Hydroxyethyl)Methacrylate. Sci. Rep. 5, 18244; doi: 10.1038/srep18244 (2015).

F. Bundy, H. Hall, H. Strong & R. Wentorf . “Man-made diamonds”, Nature 176(4471), 51–55 (1955).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

P. T. Anastas & J. C. Warner . Green chemistry: theory and practice. 2000: Oxford University Press.

M. Ceppatelli & R. Bini . “Light-Induced Catalyst and Solvent-Free High Pressure Synthesis of High Density Polyethylene at Ambient Temperature”, Macromol. Rapid Commun. 35(8), 787–793 (2014).

Article CAS Google Scholar

D. Chelazzi, M. Ceppatelli, M. Santoro, R. Bini & V. Schettino . “High-pressure synthesis of crystalline polyethylene using optical catalysis”, Nat. Mater. 3(7), 470–475 (2004).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

D. Chelazzi, M. Ceppatelli, M. Santoro, R. Bini & V. Schettino . “Pressure-Induced Polymerization in Solid Ethylene”, J. Phys. Chem. B 109(46), 21658–21663 (2005).

Article CAS Google Scholar

E. Evlyukhin et al. “Laser Assisted High Pressure Induced Polymerization of 2-(hydroxyethyl) Methacrylate”, J. Phys. Chem. B 119(8), 3577–3582 (2015).

Article CAS Google Scholar

W. Grochala, R. Hoffmann, J. Feng & N. W. Ashcroft . “The Chemical Imagination at Work in Very Tight Places”, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46(20), 3620–3642 (2007).

Article CAS Google Scholar

V. Schettino & R. Bini . “Molecules under extreme conditions: Chemical reactions at high pressure”, PCCP 5(10), 1951–1965 (2003).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

V. Schettino, R. Bini, M. Ceppatelli, L. Ciabini & M. Citroni . “Chemical Reaction at Very High Pressure”, Adv. Chem. Phys. 131, 105 (2005).

CAS Google Scholar

M. Citroni, M. Ceppatelli, R. Bini & V. Schettino . “Dimerization and Polymerization of Isoprene at High Pressures”, J. Phys. Chem. B 111(15), 3910–3917 (2007).

Article CAS Google Scholar

M. Citroni, M. Ceppatelli, R. Bini & V. Schettino . “Laser-induced selectivity for dimerization versus polymerization of butadiene under pressure”, Science 295(5562), 2058–2060 (2002).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

M. Ceppatelli, M. Santoro, R. Bini & V. Schettino . “Fourier transform infrared study of the pressure and laser induced polymerization of solid acetylene”, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 5991 (2000).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

M. Mugnai, G. Cardini & V. Schettino . “Charge separation and polymerization of hydrocarbons at an ultrahigh pressure”, Phys. Rev. B 70(2), 020101 (2004).

Article ADS Google Scholar

M. Mugnai, G. Cardini & V. Schettino . “High pressure reactivity of propene by first principles molecular dynamics calculations”, J. Chem. Phys. 120(11), 5327–5333 (2004).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

M. Mugnai, M. Pagliai, G. Cardini & V. Schettino . “Mechanism of the ethylene polymerization at very high pressure”, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4(4), 646–651 (2008).

Article CAS Google Scholar

M. Bernasconi, G. L. Chiarotti, P. Focher, M. Parrinello & E. Tosatti . “Solid-State Polymerization of Acetylene under Pressure: Ab Initio Simulation”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78(10), 2008–2011 (1997).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

M. Citroni, M. Ceppatelli, R. Bini & V. Schettino . “The high-pressure chemistry of butadiene crystal”, J. Chem. Phys. 118(4), 1815–1820 (2003).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

R. Bini . “Laser-Assisted High-Pressure Chemical Reactions”, Acc. Chem. Res. 37(2), 95–101 (2004).

Article CAS Google Scholar

S. S. D. Kumar, M. Surianarayanan, R. Vijayaraghavan, A. B. Mandal & D. R. MacFarlane . “Curcumin loaded poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) nanoparticles from gelled ionic liquid – In vitro cytotoxicity and anti-cancer activity in SKOV-3 cells”, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 51, 34–44 (2014).

Article CAS Google Scholar

R. Filmon, M. F. Baslé, H. Atmani & D. Chappard . “Adherence of osteoblast-like cells on calcospherites developed on a biomaterial combining poly(2-hydroxyethyl) methacrylate and alkaline phosphatase”, Bone 30(1), 152–158 (2002).

Article CAS Google Scholar

P. Gorbovyi, et al. “Novel nanostructured pHEMA-TiO2 hybrid materials with efficient light-induced charge separation”, Nanoscale 3(4), 1807–1812 (2011).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

A. Uklein, P. Gorbovyi, M. Traore, L. Museur & A. Kanaev . “Photo-induced refraction of nanoparticulate organic-inorganic TiO2-pHEMA hybrids”, Opt. Mater. Express 3(5), 533–545 (2013).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

P. Gorbovyi, A. Uklein, M. Traore, L. Museur & A. Kanaev . “Formation of gel of preformed size-selected titanium-oxo-alkoxy nanoparticles: towards organic-inorganic hybrid material with efficient interfacial electron transfer”, Mater. Res. Express 1(4), 045039 (2014).

Article ADS Google Scholar

G. Mabilleau, C. Cincu, M. F. Baslé & D. Chappard . “Polymerization of 2-(hydroxyethyl)methacrylate by two different initiator/accelerator systems: a Raman spectroscopic monitoring”, J. Raman Spectrosc. 39(7), 767–771 (2008).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

L. Fontana, et al. “High-pressure crystalline polyethylene studied by x-ray diffraction and ab initio simulations”, Phys. Rev. B 75(17), 174112 (2007).

Article ADS Google Scholar

W.-H. Fang & R.-Z. Liu . “Photodissociation of Acrylic Acid in the Gas Phase: An ab initio Study”, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122(44), 10886–10894 (2000).

Article CAS Google Scholar

R. N. Rosenfeld & B. R. Weiner . “Photofragmentation of acrylic acid and methacrylic acid in the gas phase”, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105(20), 6233–6236 (1983).

Article CAS Google Scholar

M. Ceppatelli, M. Santoro, R. Bini & V. Schettino . “High pressure reactivity of solid furan probed by infrared and Raman spectroscopy”, J. Chem. Phys. 118(3), 1499–1506 (2003).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

L. Ciabini, M. Santoro, R. Bini & V. Schettino . “High pressure photoinduced ring opening of benzene”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(8), 085505 (2002).

Article ADS Google Scholar

L. Ciabini, M. Santoro, R. Bini & V. Schettino . “High pressure reactivity of solid benzene probed by infrared spectroscopy”, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 2928 (2002).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

J. Lingnau & G. Meyerhoff . “The spontaneous polymerization of methyl methacrylate, 7. External heavy atom effect on the initiation”, Macromol. Chem. Phys. 185(3), 587–600 (1984).

Article CAS Google Scholar

J. Lingnau & G. Meyerhoff . “The spontaneous polymerization of methyl methacrylate: 6. Polymerization in solution: participation of transfer agents in the initiation reaction”, Polymer 24(11), 1473–1478 (1983).

Article CAS Google Scholar

M. Stickler & G. Meyerhoff . “The spontaneous thermal polymerization of methyl methacrylate: 5. Experimental study and computer simulation of the high conversion reaction at 130 °C”, Polymer 22(7), 928–933 (1981).

Article CAS Google Scholar

J. Lingnau, M. Stickler & G. Meyerhoff . “The spontaneous polymerization of methyl methacrylate-IV: Formation of cyclic dimers and linear trimers”, Eur. Polym. J. 16(8), 785–791 (1980).

Article CAS Google Scholar

S. Srinivasan, M. W. Lee, M. C. Grady, M. Soroush & A. M. Rappe . “Computational Evidence for Self-Initiation in Spontaneous High-Temperature Polymerization of Methyl Methacrylate”, J. Phys. Chem. A 115(6), 1125–1132 (2011).

Article CAS Google Scholar

H. Drickamer, C. Frank & C. Slichter . “Optical versus thermal transitions in solids at high pressure”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 69(4), 933–937 (1972).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

P. W. Bridgman . “Effects of high shearing stress combined with high hydrostatic pressure”, Phys. Rev. 48(10), 825 (1935).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

XRD1 Beamline Descriptionhttp://www.elettra.trieste.it/lightsources/elettra/elettra-beamlines/xrd1/xrd1beamlinedescription.html (2012) (access : 21/10/2015).

R. Boehler . “New diamond cell for single-crystal x-ray diffraction”, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77(11), 115103 (2006).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Download references

ANR (Agence Nationale de la Recherche) and CGI (Commissariat à l’Investissement d’Avenir) are gratefully acknowledged for their financial support of this work through Labex SEAM (Science and Engineering for Advanced Materials and devices) ANR 11 LABX 086, ANR 11 IDEX 05 02. Technical support of P. V. Zinin from the University of Hawaii is gratefully acknowledged. We are grateful to the XRD1 beamline staff, including M. Polentarutti, N. Demitri and B. Joseph, for technical support during the XRD measurements. The authors are grateful to B. Loppinet for fruitful discussions and J. Lomas for careful reading of the manuscript.

Laboratoire de Physique des Lasers - LPL, CNRS, Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 93430, Villetaneuse, France

E. Evlyukhin & L. Museur

Laboratoire des Sciences des Procédés et des Matériaux - LSPM, CNRS, Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 93430, Villetaneuse, France

M. Traore, A. Zerr & A. Kanaev

Laboratoire Interfaces Traitements Organisation et Dynamique des Systèmes - ITODYS CNRS, Université Paris Diderot Paris 7, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, Cedex 13, 75205, France

C. Perruchot

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

E.E. synthesized the samples and obtained Raman measurements under the supervision of A.Z., M.T. and L.M. E.E. and A.Z. obtained the XRD measurements. C.P. obtained the GPC measurements. L.M. and A.K. interpreted the results and wrote the manuscript. All of the authors contributed to the discussion and commented on the manuscript.

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

Evlyukhin, E., Museur, L., Traore, M. et al. A New Route for High-Purity Organic Materials: High-Pressure-Ramp-Induced Ultrafast Polymerization of 2-(Hydroxyethyl)Methacrylate. Sci Rep 5, 18244 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18244

Download citation

Received: 24 August 2015

Accepted: 10 November 2015

Published: 16 December 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18244

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Journal of Materials Science (2023)

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.